NEW DELHI: US President Donald Trump’s repeated attempts at dismantling a Global South initiative, targeting its constituents ‘brick-by-brick’ with punitive tariffs and name-calling, may have rather helped the nations come closer.
Foreign Ministers of BRICS nations, on September 27, made clear their intention of standing united against “coercion that threatens to further reduce global trade, disrupt global supply chains, or introduce uncertainty into international economic and trade activities…”
White House eyes BRICS nations as a challenge to US hegemony. The group today represents close to half the global population and around 40 per cent of the global GDP, with about 26 per cent of global trade. Its first meeting took place at the Foreign Ministers' level in 2006, much like Saturday’s gathering, at the margins of the United Nations General Assembly in New York. Three years later, the heads of member states met at their first Summit in 2009 at Ekaterinburg, Russia.
The acronym BRIC was first used in 2001 by Goldman Sachs in their Global Economics Paper, "The World Needs Better Economic BRICs". This was on the basis of econometric analyses projecting that the four economies would individually and collectively occupy far greater economic space and would be among the world’s largest economies in the next 50 years or so.
BRIC expanded into BRICS with the inclusion of South Africa at the then-member Foreign Ministers’ meeting in New York in 2010. It further grew in 2024 with Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE becoming full members from January 1, 2024. Indonesia joined the BRICS as a full member in 2025, while Belarus, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Cuba, Malaysia, Nigeria, Thailand, Uganda, and Uzbekistan were inducted as partner countries.
In recent times, President Trump has warned the bloc against planning a “de-dollarisation move”.
An article published by the policy institute Chatham House observed last month, “Washington is using Brazil to send a warning to other countries – particularly other BRICS countries like South Africa and India – on issues such as controlling digital communications, using alternative currencies to the US dollar in trade transactions, and relations with China.”
A J. P. Morgan study in July found de-dollarisation “most visible in commodity markets, where the greenback’s influence on pricing has diminished.”