Punjab

Power from Talwandi Sabo and Rajpura thermal plants in Punjab to cost more

VINOD GUPTA | August 13, 2019 02:29 PM

CHANDIGARH: The power from Talwandi Sabo and Rajpura thermal plant will cost more to the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) after the Supreme Court allowed the contempt petition of Talwandi Sabo Power Limited against Baldev Singh Sran CMD and others.

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited will have to pay washing cost of coal, the transportation from the mine site via washing of coal to the project site inclusive of cost of road transportation within a period of 8 weeks from August 7,  the date of judgment. The judgment was delivered by the Supreme Court bench of Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman and Justice Surya Kant.

 Last year in August Supreme Court has decided that the private power generating company was entitled to the coal washing and transportation costs. This amount was to be paid within a period of 12 weeks failing which it would carry 12% simple interest.

Now the cash strapped PSPCL will have to pay the arrears of Rs. 2800 crore payable to Larsen and Tubro who are operating 1400 MW Rajpura thermal and 2100 MW Talwandi sabot thermal through subsidiaries by October 2 along with one year interest charges.

This cost to be incurred by PSPCL will be passed on to the consumers who will bear the brunt of follies committed by PSPCL while finalizing the power purchase agreement.

PSPCL had signed the power purchase agreements with the private generators supplying power from Rajpura and Talwandi Sabo thermal plants for a period of 25 years. The annual washing charges will be around Rs. 500 crore for the two thermal plants.

PSPCL is already feeling the pinch of late payment of subsidy from Punjab government. PSPCL has received cash subsidy of Rs. 1622 crore up to July this year. An amount of Rs.214 crore has been adjusted against interest charges of Uday bond. As per PSPCL website an amount of 007 crore has been adjusted against excise duty and IDF due. The less subsidy received amounts to Rs.1980 crore up to July end.
At 258,965 pending cases, district and other subordinate courts make up for 64.37 per cent of the total pending cases in the country, minister of law and justice told Lok Sabha on July 19, 2019.

The lower judiciary is the first point of contact for most litigants, and the study examined access from litigants' perspective by assessing 665 district courts across India and interviewing 6,650 litigants.

The conversation around access to justice is often limited to judicial delays and pendencies while other issues such as court infrastructure seem to be overlooked. The deficiency in infrastructure is a factor that affects judicial delays and becomes relevant in improving access to justice and making court infrastructure a crucial aspect in determining how efficiently litigants are able to accustom themselves and utilize the available infrastructure.

With the objective of understanding how all the district courts in India are faring against the benchmarks laid down by the NCMS Committee, and to fill the lacuna of lack of empirical data to drive this discourse, Vidhi commissioned a survey of 665 districts across India. This was supplemented with interviews of 10 litigants per district complex on the user-friendliness/ functionality of the facilities made available and a study of the court websites to see what essential features are there. The data from 665 courts and their websites and responses from 6650 litigants reveal some of the most appalling statistics regarding lack of navigation tools, unhygienic washroom conditions, complete absence of facilities enabling barrier-free access for persons with disabilities and poor security facilities for courtrooms.


Have something to say? Post your comment